LeadsLeap

Pick and Profit - Turn Cents into Dollars

Free Leads 728x90

Instant Profits Club

MyLead can make you Money Online

Prosperity Marketing System

Prosperity Marketing System

Visitors

free counters

12 November 2009

Medical Insurance- the difference between the fortunate and the less fortunate!

What forced me to write this blog was a recent documentary on Satellite TV. To my surprise they broadcasted a very sensitive issue i.e. healthcare. Healthcare is sensitive because this is where you distinguish between the fortunate and the less fortunate or the haves and the haves not. The documentary that I watched was SickO – I sommer roughly translate it in (Afrikaans) as "siek ou" which means sick man, I might be wrong with the way I see it, but I was a victim as well. What pains me was to see that even people from 1st world countries had to go to other countries to get free healthcare. Our government really wants us to make use of the public health care system which would be a good thing if correctly administered. On advice of the former health minister I decided to make use of public healthcare and try out Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital what a mess, at first complicated procedures ranging from long queues to staff members who don't care damn, public servants that really give the man on the street an attitude. On presentation of my medical aid insurance card one staffer even asked me why not making use of private facilities. I felt bad and thought about it, but I was under the impression that the service might change. I was so wrong – because at first you waiting in a queue longer that 200meters for a stamp, thereafter another queue for the doctor, then another queue for the pharmacy. If you really want to be helped at any public facility then you must at least woke up at 4am be at the hospital at least by 6am then you will be out of there by 10am, I am convinced and wish to believe that the public facilities are not that bad and the service might even change IF all our public servants are willing to go the extra mile, with a dedicated management and staff supervision. Now to the main point – medical insurance: I was a member with one of the major medical insurance companies in South Africa, they promised during their presentation heaven and earth from 300% cover whilst in hospital to adequate cover either over the counter or private consultations. What forced me to terminate my membership after six loyal years was when one of my dependants needed surgery and the medical aid was not willing to pay for anaesthethics, i.e. the drugs required for sedation before the surgery. The medical insurance refused blatantly, according to them that was excluded on the insurance and I had to foot the bill. These exclusions were never communicated, as we the customers are normally in perfect health when applying for medical insurance. On numerous occasions I had to either settle for generics or pay levies even if the customer still have funds available in their insurance accounts and when no generics were available as a substitute. I am not the kind of person who likes to chop and change products or companies as and when required but I just decided to walk out. Now I'm with another medical insurance company, skeptical but hoping for the best. I was under the impression that these insurance companies were noble. I even remembered that there was a time when I did not make use of medical insurance for a full year, as I call it that it was my lucky year or it was the time that I used over the counter medication at my expense. I even thought at times the reason why medical insurance companies refused to pay for treatment was in order to force their customers not to use the insurance available to the clients. THE MOVIE SICKO then opened my eyes, apparently the board or the management of the particular medical insurance decides what's approve and what not, no wonder the loyal customers suffers when in need of medical assistance or hospitalization. Government is currently preaching NHI – National Health Insurance.

The big question is: WILL THIS NHI WORK – I sincerely hope so….

 

SO many questions… SO little answers…

 

Mobile Speed Trapping – LAW enforcement or moneymaking?

I cannot say that I'm impressed with the current way of happenings regarding the traffic law enforcement system, particular with the current mobile speed trapping system. I recently suffered financial loss due to the mobile speed trapping systems and I feel as if it is no longer about traffic law enforcement but more about moneymaking. Friends of mine travelled to Cape Town by car and come back with speed fines amounting to closed to R3000, all on mobile camera and within a radius of less than 20km stretch of road, some of these fines differs with between 5 and 20 minutes. Recently I travelled to Kimberley, drove safely followed all road rules, however my biggest mistake was travelling 107km on a National road whereby the speed limit is 120km/h. There were temporary road signs indicating the speed limit of 60km/h because of road works, in these zones I followed the speed limit to the latter because of the road conditions. My understanding is that once the area is clear and there is either no temporary sign or roadworks than the speed limit must revert to the original speed limit which is 120km/h on a national road, because of this I was caught on mobile camera doing 107km/h, I was then summoned via mail for an amount of R700 for the crime of exceeding the speed limit. To fight with the relevant authorities does not help because it might result in a long court process so we just pay and get it over and done with but the big problem would be when they start using the demerit system whereby your drivers licence might be revoked. Why am I asking whether this is traffic law enforcement or moneymaking…? In small local authorities or provinces there is a drastic need for visible law enforcement, however due to limited resources these guys are manning the mobile cameras, most probably the main income stream for these authorities, in bigger metro's you'll find three to four mobiles cameras on a 5km road radius, normally trapping in both directions, these metro's used latest technology equipment funded by the taxpayer at a enormous prize, now authorities are forced to trapped motorists in order to pay for these resources and still profiting, it therefore no longer constitutes traffic law enforcement, but more of a moneymaking exercise.

Why not using fixed cameras, which will provide a guaranteed income, these equipment operates day and night, through rain or sunshine and it will be much cheaper and effective to maintain. (I mean the purpose of mobile speed trapping is moneymaking not law enforcement, because if you exceeding the speed limits, the traffic official don't stop you because they hide behind trees or camping out) - The traffic law enforcement officials hiding behind the trees can then be used elsewhere or they can be used as visible law enforcement officials thus ensuring road safety and reducing road incidents.

From a personal perspective I really don't support this many mobile cameras on the road, not because I want to be reckless but I feel that those resources can be managed elsewhere and at a reasonable prize.

Now for the big question: Why paying a lot of money renting fancy equipment - Is fixed cameras the way to go?

SO many questions… SO little answers…

LeadsLeap